The guy has been fighting this for a while if I remember correctly. Without a picture of the lure this statement he made gives me a red flag:
"Ply said he did not use a spreader bar, but instead used a homemade spinnerbait lure, which typically has a blade-shaped object to spin like a propeller. He said his homemade object "cannot reasonably or in good faith be classified as a spreader bar," according to the lawsuit."
Was it a homemade spinnerbait or not? Since typically and object were used that leads me to believe he was fabricating a lure that may have been in the gray area of the rules.
Last edited by Travis C.; 08-05-2013 at 02:07 PM.