Corps agrees to public hearing on fishing restriction

[rsimms]

Corps of Engineers agrees to public hearing on fishing restriction

http://www.nooga.com/158860/corps-of...g-restriction/

[MNfisher]

Does anyone know How we can get an online petition signed by as many as possible to bring to the meeting?

[CreekWalker]

I applaud Senator Alexander's efforts. Notice that he is being diplomatic and professional and I can only hope that my peers do the same when they have their opportunity to voice their opinions.

Notice that he encourages them to “look at alternatives to the new policy” and requested that “if the corps moves forward in restricting fishing in dam tailwaters, to restrict it to the smallest area possible, consistent with the corps’ safety requirements.”

Well said.

Barking "well if so then I'm just going to x, y, & z" or "screw the government", etc. only makes that person sound seemingly unintelligent.

Don't get me wrong I am opposed to this restriction 100% but if they come to a compromise and give the public another safety rule or two I'd be happy as can be.

Let's use facts such as # of accidents in tailwaters amongst fisherman versus # of accidents on the lake(s) where a jet ski was involved as one of many examples!......

[Travis C.]

I personally think that this is simply a PR move on their (Corps) part due to the ground swell of response.

Ultimately, they can do as they wish regarding waterways and in the end say we let your voice be heard but in the end this is best for you.

[SAMBOLIE]

Originally Posted by CreekWalker

I applaud Senator Alexander's efforts. Notice that he is being diplomatic and professional and I can only hope that my peers do the same when they have their opportunity to voice their opinions.

Notice that he encourages them to “look at alternatives to the new policy” and requested that “if the corps moves forward in restricting fishing in dam tailwaters, to restrict it to the smallest area possible, consistent with the corps’ safety requirements.”

Well said.

Barking "well if so then I'm just going to x, y, & z" or "screw the government", etc. only makes that person sound seemingly unintelligent.

Don't get me wrong I am opposed to this restriction 100% but if they come to a compromise and give the public another safety rule or two I'd be happy as can be.

Let's use facts such as # of accidents in tailwaters amongst fisherman versus # of accidents on the lake(s) where a jet ski was involved as one of many examples!......

Especially among the genius government tyrants.

[nofish]

Arghhh

[nofish]

[QUOTE=Travis C.;27251]I personally think that this is simply a PR move on their (Corps) part due to the ground swell of response.

Ultimately they can do what they want.


I agree. I don't need anyone especially the government deciding what's in my best interest!!!

[jad2t]

That's exactly what this is, it's a PR move to make it look like they're actually concerned with the opinions of the people who pay their salaries. This is clearly another example of Government overreach and it's sickening to think we will no longer get to enjoy the benefit of fishing below the dams. Do it as much as you can while we're still allowed to guys, it's over soon.

[jad2t]

Since this just restriction on the Cumberland River' dams, fishing below Center Hill is still allowed, right? For now anyway...

[tkwalker]

Originally Posted by rsimms

Corps of Engineers agrees to public hearing on fishing restriction

http://www.nooga.com/158860/corps-of...g-restriction/

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has agreed to hold public hearings regarding a proposal to restrict access to tailwater fishing areas on the Cumberland River.

U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) met Thursday with Lt. Col. James A. DeLapp, commander of the Nashville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, at Alexander’s request to discuss the corps’ decision to restrict access to fishing areas in dam tailwaters on the Cumberland River System, which Alexander said is “a significant source of enjoyment for Tennesseans and visitors from around the world.”

In the meeting, Alexander asked DeLapp to give the public the opportunity to voice their concerns and hold several public meetings to take input from the people and communities affected by the decision. Alexander also encouraged DeLapp to “look at alternatives to the new policy” and requested that “if the corps moves forward in restricting fishing in dam tailwaters, to restrict it to the smallest area possible, consistent with the corps’ safety requirements.”

Alexander thanked DeLapp for agreeing to both of his requests.

Alexander is the senior Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Energy and Water, which has jurisdiction over the Army Corps of Engineers.

On Nov. 20, Alexander sent a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers, urging reconsideration of their decision.

He wrote: “At a minimum, I believe that any change of this magnitude should be subject to a public comment period, so those who enjoy fishing can have an opportunity to express their concerns and propose alternatives to improve public safety. Changes should only be considered after a thorough review of all public comments and suggestions.”

In the letter, Alexander requested a personal report on the situation from DeLapp prior to any change in practice. That personal report was delivered in today’s meeting with Alexander in his Washington office.

[Travis C.]

Originally Posted by jad2t

Since this just restriction on the Cumberland River' dams, fishing below Center Hill is still allowed, right? For now anyway...

My understanding is all dams on the Cumberland River watershed. That would include Center Hill, Percy and Dale Hollow.

[gboyce]

I do not think that this is a PR move. I just medically retired from the military after 21 years and have an idea of what he is trying to do. Every Commander that takes over a base, squadron, unit or what have you always tries to leave a legacy behind. IMO this man is making these decision for that reason. When you come up for promotion at those levels they look at what you have achieved. In his case it will be prevented XX number of deaths on the Cumberland river by enacting said new restriction. Again this is just my opinion but it seems to follow suit with what I have seen the last 21 years.

[MNfisher]

Whether a PR move or not, I am grateful that they decided to hold a meeting! It gives me light that this may not happen. Call me optimistic, but I see a lot of very pessimistic posts in this thread. If we consider it over already...it is then destined to be over. I see this meeting as a positive step!

[Travis C.]

Originally Posted by MNfisher

Whether a PR move or not, I am grateful that they decided to hold a meeting! It gives me light that this may not happen. Call me optimistic, but I see a lot of very pessimistic posts in this thread. If we consider it over already...it is then destined to be over. I see this meeting as a positive step!

I am glad they are giving the public a chance to voice concern as well and hope you're right it being a positive step.

[SAMBOLIE]

Originally Posted by MNfisher

Whether a PR move or not, I am grateful that they decided to hold a meeting! It gives me light that this may not happen. Call me optimistic, but I see a lot of very pessimistic posts in this thread. If we consider it over already...it is then destined to be over. I see this meeting as a positive step!

I bet you see light when you hear Obama give an optimistic speech. Since he talks out his ass there is no light at the end of his tunnel.