View Single Post
  #27  
Old 01-20-2015, 06:23 AM
MNfisher's Avatar
MNfisher MNfisher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNBronzeback View Post
In my opinion, and we all know the old saying about opinions, but in this particular case, the grass isnt always greener on the other side. I say that hypothetically. If there were only ever 3-4 boats/kayaks that fish there year round....the barrier move would work out good, but with the amount of boats and kayaks that can attempt to be against that barrier, it would just be compounded with more people wanting to relive the glory days of the steamplant pre-barrier along with the regulars that are there as of today. And like mentioned, there would be more people motoring up both fast and slow which would tick off other guys, causing waves and noise.

On paper it sounds and looks appealing no doubt, but i dont think it would benefit the fisherman in the long run if the barrier was moved back. No doubt alot of fish probably hang out way up there all.winter just waiting for the bait to come to them, but as it currently is sits, right at the mouth the fish have only 1 way in and 1 way out. Be there at the right time and the fish will be coming or going...there is no searching for them...they are going to pass thru sooner or later.

Just my 2 cents.

Couldn't agree more. If the barrier was moved up. Then the fish would just move up. The areas where you catch fish now behind the barrier, would for the most part be void of fish due to boats. And yes, the boats would come in that channel on plane. It happened all the time pre barrier.


Mike
__________________
Keep Livin' the Dream!

Mike
Reply With Quote